Cheetah Mobile Inc. CMCM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1597835Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Han KunFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jul 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Maples and Calder | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
| Han Kun | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steve LinKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Will H. CaiCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve LinKirkland & Ellis | Jul 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Will H. CaiCooley LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 73 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| James C. LinDavis Polk | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 124 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.01 |