Lombard Medical, Inc. EVAR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1597426Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Barnes & ThornburgFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 167 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2016 · Text search only · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Jan 2016 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes & Thornburg | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 167 | 1.07 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jan 2014 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Covington & Burling | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.97 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jan 2016 | Text search only | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Perkins Coie | Jan 2016 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Alston & Bird | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter J. EkbergFaegre & BensonFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 3.89× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Brian K. RosenzweigCovington & BurlingFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter J. EkbergFaegre & Benson | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.66 | 3.89 | 1.55 |
| Brian K. RosenzweigCovington & Burling | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.58 |