ETERIS B.V.
CIK 1596089Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Linklaters LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Jones DayFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Linklaters LLP | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Jones Day | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellen J. OdonerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James R. GriffinWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Keith A. FlaumCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alain DermarkarShearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- R. SCOTT COHENWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- TROY B. LEWISJones DayFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 5.13× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellen J. OdonerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James R. GriffinWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Keith A. FlaumCooley LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Alain DermarkarShearman & Sterling | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 11 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| R. SCOTT COHENWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 18 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.57 |
| TROY B. LEWISJones Day | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 5.13 | 0.00 |