Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. GLMD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1595353Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Meitar Law OfficesFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Meitar Liquornik Geva Leshem Tal, Law OfficesFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Tulchinsky Stern Marciano Cohen Levitski & Co., Law OfficesFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Pearl CohenFirst linked Jun 2023 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2018 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Strategic alliance with MWE China Law OfficesFirst linked Mar 2018 · Text search only · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meitar Law Offices | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 61 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Meitar Liquornik Geva Leshem Tal, Law Offices | Mar 2018 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| DLA Piper | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Tulchinsky Stern Marciano Cohen Levitski & Co., Law Offices | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pearl Cohen | Jun 2023 | Text search only | 44 | 1.15 | 0.68 | 1.35 |
| Cooley LLP | Mar 2018 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Strategic alliance with MWE China Law Offices | Mar 2018 | Text search only | 55 | 0.28 | 0.57 | 0.70 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael SoumasGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Mar 2026 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gary EmmanuelMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Shachar HadarSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Scott A. CowanDLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.25× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Andrew P. GilbertDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Robert L. GrossmanGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Mike RimonMeitar Law OfficesFirst linked Jun 2023 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- David CohenTulchinsky Stern Marciano Cohen Levitski & Co., Law OfficesFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael SoumasGreenberg Traurig | Mar 2026 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gary EmmanuelMcDermott Will & Emery | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.76 | 1.18 | 1.02 |
| Shachar HadarSullivan & Worcester LLP | Mar 2018 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Scott A. CowanDLA Piper | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 3.25 | 0.61 |
| Andrew P. GilbertDLA Piper | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 1.01 |
| Robert L. GrossmanGreenberg Traurig | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Mike RimonMeitar Law Offices | Jun 2023 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Mar 2021 | Text search only | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| David CohenTulchinsky Stern Marciano Cohen Levitski & Co., Law Offices | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |