Gates Global Inc.
CIK 1594328Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 2,669 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 245 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 1,688 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 2,669 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Allen & Overy | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 245 | 0.99 | 0.36 | 0.62 |
| Bracewell LLP | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 0.96 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 1,688 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| Torys LLP | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 170 | 1.21 | 0.44 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Rachel W. SheridanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Paul F. SheridanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachel W. SheridanLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 45 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| Paul F. SheridanLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 20 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 1.35 |