Sky Solar Holdings, Ltd. SKYS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1594124Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Dec 2014 to Sep 2019
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Fogler RubinoffFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Dacheng Law OfficesFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jul 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.17 |
| Clifford Chance US LLP | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.85 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Sidley Austin | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Fogler Rubinoff | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 19 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 1.43 |
| Dacheng Law Offices | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 50 | 1.71 | 0.69 | 1.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel DusekKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2020 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Herman H. RaspéPatterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- CAREY Y CIA. LTDA.First linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.40×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel DusekKirkland & Ellis | Jul 2020 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Jul 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.22 |
| Herman H. RaspéPatterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| CAREY Y CIA. LTDA. | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 7 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 3.40 |