Navient LLC NAVI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1593538Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2026 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2024 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 2019 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2026 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2024 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Apr 2019 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard J. GrossmanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Erica SchohnSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.91×
- Andrea L. NicolasSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Alan J. SinsheimerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2019 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Robert W. Murray Jr.Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard J. GrossmanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Erica SchohnSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Aug 2017 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 1.91 |
| Andrea L. NicolasSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Alan J. SinsheimerSullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2019 | Text search only | 17 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Robert W. Murray Jr.Baker Botts L.L.P. | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 19 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 1.10 |