Endo International plc ENDP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1593034Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Feb 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2015 to Oct 2022
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- A&L GoodbodyFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- McCullough O Connor IrwinFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 2.54× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Nutter McClennen & FishFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Davies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2014 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| A&L Goodbody | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 85 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| McCullough O Connor Irwin | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 13 | 1.12 | 2.54 | 1.83 |
| Morgan Lewis | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Nutter McClennen & Fish | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 88 | 0.75 | 0.47 | 0.85 |
| Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 94 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 1.11 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Torys LLP | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 170 | 1.22 | 0.44 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael J. ZeidelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in a filing · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Stacy J. KanterSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in a filing · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Alison S. ResslerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Keith A. PagnaniSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Erica SchohnSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.91×
- Brandon Van DykeSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Eileen T. NugentSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael J. ZeidelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Aug 2021 | Named in a filing | 63 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Stacy J. KanterSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2015 | Named in a filing | 73 | 1.60 | 0.31 | 0.62 |
| Alison S. ResslerSullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2014 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Keith A. PagnaniSullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2014 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Erica SchohnSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 1.91 |
| Brandon Van DykeSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 21 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 1.45 |
| Eileen T. NugentSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 0.35 |