Presbia PLC LENS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1591096Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- May 2015 to Dec 2018
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- A&L GoodbodyFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Arthur CoxFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covington & Burling | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Baker & Hostetler | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| A&L Goodbody | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 85 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Arthur Cox | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 92 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Donald J. MurrayCovington & BurlingFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Matthew T. GehlCovington & BurlingFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Peter H. EhrenbergLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald J. MurrayCovington & Burling | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.20 | 0.59 | 1.19 |
| Matthew T. GehlCovington & Burling | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Peter H. EhrenbergLowenstein Sandler | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.98 | 0.60 | 1.42 |