uniQure N.V. QURE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1590560Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Jun 2019 to Jul 2024
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Lewis | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| DLA Piper | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.30 |
| HALE AND DORR | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Benjamin SteinMorgan LewisFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- David E. RedlickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Timothy J. CorbettMorgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin SteinMorgan Lewis | Feb 2023 | Named in a filing | 6 | 3.27 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| David E. RedlickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 1.24 | 0.33 | 0.95 |
| Timothy J. CorbettMorgan Lewis | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.28 |