TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD TANH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1588084Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Guantao Law FirmFirst linked Jun 2026 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Campbells LLPFirst linked Aug 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- DeHeng Law OfficesFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Kaufman & Canoles, P.C.First linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Pearlman Schneider LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.79× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guantao Law Firm | Jun 2026 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.90 | 1.03 | 0.98 |
| Campbells LLP | Aug 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| DeHeng Law Offices | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Kaufman & Canoles, P.C. | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 0.92 | 0.65 | 1.46 |
| Pearlman Schneider LLP | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 32 | 1.34 | 1.79 | 1.41 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Yan Natalie WangKaufman & Canoles, P.C.First linked Jul 2024 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Anthony W. BaschKaufman & Canoles, P.C.First linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 0.46× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yan Natalie WangKaufman & Canoles, P.C. | Jul 2024 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |
| Anthony W. BaschKaufman & Canoles, P.C. | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 1.25 |