Knowles Corp KN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1587523Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Schiff HardinFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Mayer Brown | May 2015 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Schiff Hardin | May 2015 | Text search only | 184 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.26 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lindsey A. SmithSidley AustinFirst linked May 2018 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
- Jennifer F. FitchenSidley AustinFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Paul L. ChoiSidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael A. CivaleSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsey A. SmithSidley Austin | May 2018 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.54 |
| Jennifer F. FitchenSidley Austin | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Paul L. ChoiSidley Austin | Mar 2014 | Named in a filing | 21 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael A. CivaleSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 1.06 |