CHC Group Ltd. HELIQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1586300Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Jan 2014 to Jan 2016
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- A&L GoodbodyFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Blake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 227 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- King & WoodFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Paul Hastings | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| A&L Goodbody | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 85 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Blake Cassels & Graydon | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 227 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.80 |
| DLA Piper | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| King & Wood | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.24 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan HambeltonCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.76×
- James CrossSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.40×
- Christopher MaySimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- William E. CurbowSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.20×
- Joshua Ford BonnieSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Louis LehotCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.94×
- Michael E. TentaCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Ryan BekkerusSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
- Scott R. SaksNorton RoseFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan HambeltonCooley LLP | Oct 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.76 |
| James CrossSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.40 |
| Christopher MaySimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 1.79 |
| William E. CurbowSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 2.20 |
| Joshua Ford BonnieSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Louis LehotCooley LLP | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.94 |
| Michael E. TentaCooley LLP | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Ryan BekkerusSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 1.63 |
| Scott R. SaksNorton Rose | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.74 |