SunEdison Semiconductor Ltd SEMI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1585854Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Rajah & TannFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryan Cave | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 471 | 1.08 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Rajah & Tann | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 53 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Paul Hastings | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dennis M. MyersKirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Andrew RodmanBryan CaveFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Bradley ReedKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Tad J. FreeseLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis M. MyersKirkland & Ellis | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Andrew RodmanBryan Cave | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 10 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Bradley ReedKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 13 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Tad J. FreeseLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 58 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 1.55 |