Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. HLT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1585689Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 21
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Rice Reuther Sullivan & CarrollFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Dentons US LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Hill Ward & HendersonFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLCFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Jones WalkerFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Rice Reuther Sullivan & Carroll | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 7 | 1.38 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Dentons US LLP | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 102 | 0.91 | 0.40 | 1.48 |
| Hill Ward & Henderson | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 34 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 10 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Jones Walker | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 161 | 1.34 | 0.23 | 0.94 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Sidley Austin | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| DLA Piper | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Goodwin Procter | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John B. MeadeDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Joshua Ford BonnieSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Michael KaplanDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Erika L. RobinsonWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Michael J. AlbanoCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2013 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John B. MeadeDavis Polk | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Joshua Ford BonnieSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Michael KaplanDavis Polk | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 112 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Erika L. RobinsonWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 42 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Michael J. AlbanoCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 22 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2013 | Text search only | 58 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.53 |