Jaguar Health, Inc. JAGX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1585608Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Aug 2022 to Aug 2026
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked May 2017 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2017 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Apr 2017 · Text search only · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Gusrae Kaplan & BrunoFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Thompson CoburnFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Husch BlackwellFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- White & CaseFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Cooley LLP | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Reed Smith | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Covington & Burling | May 2017 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Greenberg Traurig | May 2017 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Seward & Kissel | Apr 2017 | Text search only | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
| Gusrae Kaplan & Bruno | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 76 | 0.60 | 1.31 | 0.89 |
| Thompson Coburn | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 85 | 1.13 | 1.01 | 1.33 |
| Husch Blackwell | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 154 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.18 |
| King & Spalding | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 98 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 1.34 |
| White & Case | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey G. AromatorioReed SmithFirst linked May 2021 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Richard A. FriedmanSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- David T. MittelmanReed SmithFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.19× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- Michael S. LeeReed SmithFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Brad L. ShiffmanBlank RomeFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Donald C. ReinkeReed SmithFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 7.40× · 95% wipeout 2.24×
- John T. McKennaCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Marianne SarrazinGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 2.86× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Lawrence G. NusbaumGusrae Kaplan & BrunoFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 1.57× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey G. AromatorioReed Smith | May 2021 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Richard A. FriedmanSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 190 | 1.27 | 1.93 | 1.29 |
| David T. MittelmanReed Smith | Apr 2017 | Named in a filing | 21 | 2.19 | 1.51 | 1.60 |
| Michael S. LeeReed Smith | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Brad L. ShiffmanBlank Rome | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 1.33 | 0.74 | 1.61 |
| Donald C. ReinkeReed Smith | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 7.40 | 2.24 |
| John T. McKennaCooley LLP | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 97 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 1.10 |
| Marianne SarrazinGoodwin Procter | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.77 | 2.86 | 1.25 |
| Lawrence G. NusbaumGusrae Kaplan & Bruno | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 46 | 0.99 | 1.57 | 0.70 |