Del Taco Restaurants, Inc. TACO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1585583Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Strategic alliance with MWE China Law OfficesFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Stanley H. Meadows, P.C.First linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic alliance with MWE China Law Offices | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.28 | 0.57 | 0.70 |
| Akin Gump | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Stanley H. Meadows, P.C. | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott R. WilliamsSidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Eric OrsicMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jul 2016 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Heidi SteeleMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & CaseFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Bruce S. MendelsohnAkin GumpFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott R. WilliamsSidley Austin | Mar 2022 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Eric OrsicMcDermott Will & Emery | Jul 2016 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Heidi SteeleMcDermott Will & Emery | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & Case | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 195 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 1.03 |
| Bruce S. MendelsohnAkin Gump | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.51 |