TOPS HOLDING II CORP
CIK 1584701Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Squire SandersFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in a filing · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Hodgson RussFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Robinson & Cole LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 133 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Squire Sanders | Sep 2013 | Named in a filing | 208 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 1.03 |
| Hodgson Russ | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 85 | 1.15 | 0.91 | 1.30 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Robinson & Cole LLP | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 133 | 0.95 | 0.56 | 0.83 |
| Winston & Strawn | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.01 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael BenjaminLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
- John J. ZakHodgson RussFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- Robert M. KatzShearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
- Dominick P. DeChiaraWinston & StrawnFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael BenjaminLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 1.83 |
| John J. ZakHodgson Russ | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 14 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.46 |
| Robert M. KatzShearman & Sterling | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 22 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.34 |
| Dominick P. DeChiaraWinston & Strawn | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.16 |