Aramark ARMK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1584509Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 245 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Allen & Overy | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 245 | 0.99 | 0.36 | 0.63 |
| DLA Piper | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Stoel Rives | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.15 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.06 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph KaufmanSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.44 |