Tricon Residential Inc.
CIK 1584425Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in a filing · 227 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Goodmans LLPFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in a filing · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Davies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Feb 2024 · Text search only · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Feb 2024 · Text search only · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2024 · Text search only · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blake Cassels & Graydon | Oct 2021 | Named in a filing | 227 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.79 |
| Goodmans LLP | Oct 2021 | Named in a filing | 72 | 1.03 | 0.32 | 0.95 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Oct 2021 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.81 |
| Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Feb 2024 | Text search only | 94 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 1.04 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Feb 2024 | Text search only | 155 | 1.15 | 0.16 | 0.74 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2024 | Text search only | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew W. AbbottPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Feb 2024 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Christopher J. CummingsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in a filing · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Brian M. StadlerSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2024 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- Matthew B. RogersSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2024 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew W. AbbottPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Feb 2024 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Christopher J. CummingsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Oct 2021 | Named in a filing | 60 | 1.20 | 0.38 | 0.69 |
| Brian M. StadlerSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2024 | Text search only | 39 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| Matthew B. RogersSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2024 | Text search only | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |