PBF Logistics LP PBFX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1582568Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Oct 2015 · Named in a filing · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2015 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2015 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Drinker Biddle & ReathFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 213 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Sep 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Oct 2015 | Named in a filing | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Oct 2015 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2015 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Drinker Biddle & Reath | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 213 | 1.46 | 0.77 | 1.25 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jordan HirschHunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Philip HainesHunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Sep 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jordan M. RosenbaumKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Todd E. LensonStroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Douglas S. HorowitzCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Michael J. SwidlerVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan HirschHunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Philip HainesHunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Sep 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jordan M. RosenbaumKramer Levin Naftalis | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Todd E. LensonStroock & Stroock & Lavan | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Douglas S. HorowitzCahill Gordon & Reindel | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Michael J. SwidlerVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & Reindel | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 1.15 |