TiGenix NV
CIK 1581987Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Moore & Van AllenFirst linked Dec 2016 · Text search only · 131 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Dec 2016 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- White & CaseFirst linked Dec 2016 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Oct 2015 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Linklaters LLPFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Davis Polk | Apr 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Proskauer Rose | Oct 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Moore & Van Allen | Dec 2016 | Text search only | 131 | 0.66 | 0.17 | 0.90 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Dec 2016 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| White & Case | Dec 2016 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Allen & Overy | Oct 2015 | Text search only | 244 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.66 |
| Linklaters LLP | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel BrassDavis PolkFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Michael J. WillischDavis PolkFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel BrassDavis Polk | Apr 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Michael J. WillischDavis Polk | Apr 2018 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |