Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. SC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1580608Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Sep 2021 · Named in a filing · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in a filing · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covington & Burling | Sep 2021 | Named in a filing | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Feb 2020 | Named in a filing | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jul 2013 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2013 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in a filing · 148 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
- Andrew MentCovington & BurlingFirst linked Sep 2021 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Scott F. SmithCovington & BurlingFirst linked Sep 2021 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
- Mark F. VeblenWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Benjamin M. RothWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Elizabeth A. CooperSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.35×
- Lee MeyersonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Joel F. HeroldCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2022 | Named in a filing | 148 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.43 |
| Andrew MentCovington & Burling | Sep 2021 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| Scott F. SmithCovington & Burling | Sep 2021 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 0.36 |
| Mark F. VeblenWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Benjamin M. RothWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2013 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Elizabeth A. CooperSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 37 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 0.35 |
| Lee MeyersonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 44 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Joel F. HeroldCravath Swaine & Moore | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 8 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 1.21 |