NewPage Holdings Inc.
CIK 1578086Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 23
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PCFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Akin GumpFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Bennett JonesFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 122 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Blank RomeFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 742 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 435 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 2,669 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Morris JamesFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Pachulski Stang Ziehl & JonesFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 769 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 493 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 149 | 0.72 | 1.18 | 1.13 |
| Bracewell LLP | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 0.96 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.06 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.81 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Akin Gump | May 2013 | Text search only | 582 | 1.21 | 0.52 | 1.16 |
| Bennett Jones | May 2013 | Text search only | 122 | 1.27 | 0.16 | 1.22 |
| Blank Rome | May 2013 | Text search only | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.37 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2013 | Text search only | 742 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Dechert LLP | May 2013 | Text search only | 435 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | May 2013 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.84 |
| Foley & Lardner | May 2013 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.98 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2013 | Text search only | 2,669 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | May 2013 | Text search only | 439 | 1.01 | 0.35 | 0.70 |
| Morris James | May 2013 | Text search only | 95 | 1.62 | 0.42 | 0.89 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | May 2013 | Text search only | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.84 |
| Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones | May 2013 | Text search only | 11 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Paul Hastings | May 2013 | Text search only | 769 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.08 |
| Proskauer Rose | May 2013 | Text search only | 493 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.05 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | May 2013 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 1.01 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 2013 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher T. CoxCadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.31×
- David E. SobelPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- David S. HuntingtonPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher T. CoxCadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.35 | 0.00 | 0.31 |
| David E. SobelPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 20 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| David S. HuntingtonPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 51 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.78 |