Premier, Inc. PINC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1577916Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2025 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Strategic alliance with MWE China Law OfficesFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Vedder PriceFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2025 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Strategic alliance with MWE China Law Offices | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 55 | 0.28 | 0.57 | 0.70 |
| ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 58 | 1.13 | 0.57 | 1.27 |
| Vedder Price | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 144 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.94 |
| King & Spalding | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Heidi SteeleMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Andrew A. GerberHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Mark J. MihanovicMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi SteeleMcDermott Will & Emery | Aug 2022 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Andrew A. GerberHunton & Williams | Oct 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Mark J. MihanovicMcDermott Will & Emery | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.58 | 1.16 | 1.15 |