Ladder Capital Corp LADR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1577670Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Hahn & HessenFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
- Kaye ScholerFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Willkie Farr | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Hahn & Hessen | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.99 |
| Kaye Scholer | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 161 | 0.88 | 1.03 | 1.00 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Luke R. JenningsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- Brian HechtKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Michael KimKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luke R. JenningsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2020 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| Brian HechtKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2016 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Michael KimKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.82 |