Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP
CIK 1574632Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,688 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,688 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Michael KimKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| Michael KimKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.73 |