WCI, LLC WCIC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1574532Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2017 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Shipman & GoodwinFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Akin GumpFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Fox Rothschild LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Kaye ScholerFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- White & CaseFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Jan 2017 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Proskauer Rose | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Shipman & Goodwin | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 54 | 1.25 | 0.82 | 1.18 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Willkie Farr | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Akerman LLP | May 2013 | Text search only | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Akin Gump | May 2013 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Fox Rothschild LLP | May 2013 | Text search only | 149 | 0.92 | 1.38 | 0.90 |
| Haynes and Boone | May 2013 | Text search only | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Kaye Scholer | May 2013 | Text search only | 161 | 0.88 | 1.03 | 1.00 |
| White & Case | May 2013 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Winston & Strawn | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Frank J. LopezProskauer RoseFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Michael A. SchwartzWillkie FarrFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank J. LopezProskauer Rose | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Michael A. SchwartzWillkie Farr | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 24 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.00 |