CC Holdings GS V LLC
CIK 1574291Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carlton FieldsFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Gardere Wynne Sewell LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Robinson & Cole LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 133 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlton Fields | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 47 | 1.34 | 0.44 | 1.13 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 117 | 1.13 | 0.97 | 1.24 |
| Robinson & Cole LLP | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 133 | 0.95 | 0.56 | 0.88 |
| Sidley Austin | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Thompson & Knight | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Johnny G. SkumpijaCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.77×
- Stephen L. BurnsCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johnny G. SkumpijaCravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 15 | 3.73 | 0.00 | 1.77 |
| Stephen L. BurnsCravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 24 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.87 |