Fantex, Inc. JKMTL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1573683Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.21 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Willkie Farr | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.82 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alexander T. WhiteLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.44×
- David PeinsippCooley LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Jim MorroneLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Joel H. TrotterLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Patrick A. PohlenLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Brian KornPepper HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander T. WhiteLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.44 |
| David PeinsippCooley LLP | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 86 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.53 |
| Jim MorroneLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Joel H. TrotterLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Patrick A. PohlenLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 1.20 | 1.25 | 0.98 |
| Brian KornPepper Hamilton | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.21 |