Jones Energy, Inc. JONE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1573166Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Apr 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Dec 2016 to Nov 2018
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2015 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Moore & Van AllenFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 131 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2013 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2015 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Thompson & Knight | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
| Bracewell LLP | May 2013 | Text search only | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Mayer Brown | May 2013 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Moore & Van Allen | May 2013 | Text search only | 131 | 0.66 | 0.17 | 0.90 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew R. PaceyKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2019 · Named in a filing · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Michael W. RigdonKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2019 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Mollie DuckworthBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.95×
- Douglas E. McWilliamsVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- James M. PrinceVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Michael L. BengtsonBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 2.36× · 95% wipeout 2.61×
- Paul F. PereaBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew R. PaceyKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2019 | Named in a filing | 72 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Michael W. RigdonKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2019 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Mollie DuckworthBaker Botts L.L.P. | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 1.95 |
| Douglas E. McWilliamsVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 62 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| James M. PrinceVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| Michael L. BengtsonBaker Botts L.L.P. | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.83 | 2.36 | 2.61 |
| Paul F. PereaBaker Botts L.L.P. | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.56 |