UCP, Inc. UCP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1572684Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Aug 2017 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.81 |
| Davis Polk | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Sidley Austin | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,211 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| DLA Piper | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey D. MarellPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Ross A. FieldstonPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Alan F. DenenbergDavis PolkFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- J. Gerard CumminsSidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 2.23× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Douglas J. ReinDLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey D. MarellPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Aug 2017 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Ross A. FieldstonPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Aug 2017 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Alan F. DenenbergDavis Polk | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| J. Gerard CumminsSidley Austin | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.88 | 2.23 | 0.00 |
| Douglas J. ReinDLA Piper | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 27 | 1.08 | 0.49 | 0.81 |