Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. ICE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1571949Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2022 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- McKenna Long & AldridgeFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Morgan Lewis | Jun 2022 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| McKenna Long & Aldridge | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 62 | 1.33 | 0.27 | 1.25 |
| Patton Boggs | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.31 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Catherine M. ClarkinSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- John EvangelakosSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 2.37× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine M. ClarkinSullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| John EvangelakosSullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.95 | 2.37 | 0.00 |