Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp CHMI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1571776Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayer Brown | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.00 |
| Venable LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.78 | 0.38 | 0.71 |
| Hunton & Williams | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Zach SwartzVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Dec 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul D. TroppRopes & GrayFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 109 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Daniel M. LeBeyHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- David S. FreedVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Victoria HaleSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zach SwartzVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Dec 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul D. TroppRopes & Gray | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 109 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Daniel M. LeBeyHunton & Williams | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.48 | 0.96 | 0.82 |
| David S. FreedVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Victoria HaleSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 52 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 2.01 |