Clearway Energy, Inc. CWEN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1567683Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Sep 2018 · Named in a filing · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 163 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Murtha CullinaFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.89× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Jones DayFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- White & CaseFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Sep 2018 | Named in a filing | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Ballard Spahr | Jun 2015 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Cozen O'Connor P.C. | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 163 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.94 |
| King & Spalding | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Murtha Cullina | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 36 | 1.26 | 0.89 | 1.26 |
| Jones Day | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Sidley Austin | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Stoel Rives | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
| White & Case | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- M. Preston BernhiselBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Sep 2018 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.47×
- Paul D. ZierKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Kirk A. DavenportLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Patrick H. ShannonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Gerald T. NowakKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Preston BernhiselBaker Botts L.L.P. | Sep 2018 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.47 |
| Paul D. ZierKirkland & Ellis | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Kirk A. DavenportLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Patrick H. ShannonLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| Gerald T. NowakKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 38 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.55 |