KAMADA LTD KMDA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1567529Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Arnall Golden GregoryFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 1.11× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Venable LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| Arnall Golden Gregory | May 2013 | Text search only | 60 | 0.66 | 1.11 | 1.16 |
| Venable LLP | May 2013 | Text search only | 506 | 0.78 | 0.38 | 0.71 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jaclyn LiuMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Andrew D. ThorpeOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Bruce A. MannMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Michael KaplanDavis PolkFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaclyn LiuMorrison & Foerster | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Andrew D. ThorpeOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Bruce A. MannMorrison & Foerster | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Michael KaplanDavis Polk | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 112 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.86 |