Alphabet Holding Company, Inc.
CIK 1566978Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Dechert LLP | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason M. LichtLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Rachel W. SheridanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- David S. DantzicLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason M. LichtLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Rachel W. SheridanLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
| David S. DantzicLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 10 | 2.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 |