LogicMark, Inc. LGMK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1566826Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 100%
- Mar 2022 to Mar 2026
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPFirst linked Aug 2026 · Named in a filing · 169 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in a filing · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Gracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Sullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Jul 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 212 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Robinson BrogFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 2.30×
- Grushko & MittmanFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 2.53× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Gersten Savage LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Aug 2026 | Named in a filing | 169 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 1.25 |
| Blank Rome | Dec 2023 | Named in a filing | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Pryor Cashman | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
| Gracin & Marlow, LLP | Aug 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.97 | 2.34 | 1.38 |
| Sullivan & Worcester LLP | Jul 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 212 | 0.95 | 0.45 | 1.06 |
| Robinson Brog | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.86 | 0.72 | 2.30 |
| Grushko & Mittman | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 103 | 1.19 | 2.53 | 1.25 |
| Gersten Savage LLP | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 137 | 1.20 | 1.38 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas J. PolettiK&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2026 · Named in a filing · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Aaron M. SchleicherSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- M. Ali PanjwaniPryor CashmanFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 2.24× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Leslie MarlowBlank RomeFirst linked Sep 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 2.60× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.84× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Scott M. MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Michael DeDonatoSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 2.11× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
- Joseph E. SegiliaSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.62× · Went dark 2.27× · 95% wipeout 2.30×
- Avraham S. AdlerRobinson BrogFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.09× · Went dark 1.04× · 95% wipeout 4.11×
- David E. DanovitchSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Zachary BlumenthalRobinson BrogFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.63×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas J. PolettiK&L Gates | Aug 2026 | Named in a filing | 71 | 1.51 | 1.24 | 1.75 |
| Aaron M. SchleicherSullivan & Worcester LLP | Dec 2022 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| M. Ali PanjwaniPryor Cashman | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 80 | 2.02 | 2.24 | 1.25 |
| Leslie MarlowBlank Rome | Sep 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 0.58 | 2.60 | 1.43 |
| Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLP | Aug 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.40 | 1.84 | 1.89 |
| Scott M. MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Aug 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.71 | 1.47 | 1.24 |
| Michael DeDonatoSullivan & Worcester LLP | Feb 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 2.07 | 2.11 | 1.67 |
| Joseph E. SegiliaSullivan & Worcester LLP | Aug 2014 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.62 | 2.27 | 2.30 |
| Avraham S. AdlerRobinson Brog | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.09 | 1.04 | 4.11 |
| David E. DanovitchSullivan & Worcester LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 0.88 | 1.89 | 1.25 |
| Zachary BlumenthalRobinson Brog | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 2.63 |