NantHealth, Inc. NHIQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1566469Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Sep 2016 to Dec 2022
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Choate Hall & StewartFirst linked Apr 2016 · Text search only · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Apr 2016 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Apr 2016 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Choate Hall & Stewart | Apr 2016 | Text search only | 142 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 1.29 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Apr 2016 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Holland & Knight | Apr 2016 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas E. HornishWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.04×
- Dan HorwoodWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.43×
- Sean M. ClaytonCooley LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Andrew S. WilliamsonCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Charles S. KimCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- David PeinsippCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Martin J. WatersWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 2.49×
- Megan J. BaierWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2016 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
- Tom McAleaveyHolland & KnightFirst linked Apr 2016 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.95×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas E. HornishWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 4.08 | 0.00 | 2.04 |
| Dan HorwoodWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 3.83 | 0.00 | 2.43 |
| Sean M. ClaytonCooley LLP | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Andrew S. WilliamsonCooley LLP | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| Charles S. KimCooley LLP | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 118 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| David PeinsippCooley LLP | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 86 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 102 | 1.24 | 0.83 | 1.51 |
| Martin J. WatersWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.91 | 0.88 | 2.49 |
| Megan J. BaierWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2016 | Text search only | 24 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 1.99 |
| Tom McAleaveyHolland & Knight | Apr 2016 | Text search only | 7 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.95 |