Intapp, Inc. INTA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1565687Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Linklaters LLPFirst linked Jul 2025 · Named in a filing · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked May 2023 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 1,211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.First linked May 2021 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linklaters LLP | Jul 2025 | Named in a filing | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Proskauer Rose | May 2023 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.05 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| Sidley Austin | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 1,211 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 500 | 1.10 | 0.61 | 1.06 |
| ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 58 | 1.13 | 0.57 | 1.23 |
| White & Case | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Baker & McKenzie | May 2021 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. | May 2021 | Text search only | 154 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian D. PaulsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Kristina TraugerShearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Robert MasellaGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John M. RaffertyMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Tad J. FreeseLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian D. PaulsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| Kristina TraugerShearman & Sterling | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Robert MasellaGoodwin Procter | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John M. RaffertyMorrison & Foerster | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 15 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Tad J. FreeseLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 58 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 1.55 |