PINNACLE FOODS INC. PF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1564822Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
| Perkins Coie | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Victoria HaleSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
- Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Richard A. FenyesSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Craig F. ArcellaCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Daniel ClivnerSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria HaleSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 2.01 |
| Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2012 | Named in a filing | 58 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Richard A. FenyesSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| Craig F. ArcellaCravath Swaine & Moore | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 43 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 160 | 1.27 | 0.15 | 0.83 |
| Daniel ClivnerSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 11 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 0.94 |