SOPHIRIS BIO INC. SPHS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1563855Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Aug 2016 to Mar 2020
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Fasken MartineauFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Aird & BerlisFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Blake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 227 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Fasken Martineau | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 126 | 1.03 | 0.37 | 0.87 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Aird & Berlis | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 25 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.89 |
| Blake Cassels & Graydon | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 227 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.80 |
| DLA Piper | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| Willkie Farr | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Karen E. AndersonCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2019 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Carlos RamirezCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Karen E. DeschaineCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Kristin VanderPasCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Barbara L. BordenCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- L. Kay ChandlerCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Cheston J. LarsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Scott A. ArenareFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen E. AndersonCooley LLP | Aug 2019 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Carlos RamirezCooley LLP | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| Karen E. DeschaineCooley LLP | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Kristin VanderPasCooley LLP | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 61 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Barbara L. BordenCooley LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 0.89 | 0.31 | 0.32 |
| L. Kay ChandlerCooley LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Cheston J. LarsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 46 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 1.55 |
| Scott A. Arenare | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 12 | 2.48 | 0.00 | 1.32 |