Harvard Apparatus Regenerative Technology, Inc. HRGN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1563665Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- May 2016 to Dec 2017
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jan 2017 · Named in a filing · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Burns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- HART & HARTFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 2.20× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Jaffe Raitt Heuer & WeissFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.26× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jan 2017 | Named in a filing | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Burns & Levinson LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| HART & HART | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 50 | 1.47 | 2.20 | 1.27 |
| Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 37 | 0.26 | 0.50 | 1.65 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert A. PetittBurns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
- Joseph A. SmithEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jan 2017 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 2.59× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Chad J. PorterBurns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Josef B. VolmanBurns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert A. PetittBurns & Levinson LLP | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.54 |
| Joseph A. SmithEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jan 2017 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.74 | 2.59 | 1.32 |
| Chad J. PorterBurns & Levinson LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| Josef B. VolmanBurns & Levinson LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 1.69 |