CONSTELLIUM SE CSTM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1563411Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2019 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Mayer Brown | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Reed Smith | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter E. DevlinDavis PolkFirst linked Jun 2026 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Benjamin D. SternLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Hans WitteveenStibbe P.C.First linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alison M. ZieskeWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.04×
- Andrew J. NussbaumWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Keith L. HalverstamLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter E. DevlinDavis Polk | Jun 2026 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Benjamin D. SternLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2014 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Hans WitteveenStibbe P.C. | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Alison M. ZieskeWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 2.04 |
| Andrew J. NussbaumWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Keith L. HalverstamLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 1.24 |