First Internet Bancorp INBK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1562463Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 138 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 4.29× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Drinker Biddle & ReathFirst linked Oct 2021 · Text search only · 213 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Taft Stettinius & HollisterFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Oct 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 138 | 1.29 | 4.29 | 1.16 |
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Drinker Biddle & Reath | Oct 2021 | Text search only | 213 | 1.46 | 0.77 | 1.25 |
| Baker & Daniels | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
| Taft Stettinius & Hollister | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 94 | 1.64 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christine G. LongFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Kevin M. HoulihanElias, Matz, Tiernan & Herrick L.L.P.First linked Sep 2013 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- David C. WorrellBaker & DanielsFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Joshua L. ColburnFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- JAMES A. STRAINSommer & Barnard PCFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christine G. LongFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Kevin M. HoulihanElias, Matz, Tiernan & Herrick L.L.P. | Sep 2013 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.18 | 0.90 | 0.88 |
| David C. WorrellBaker & Daniels | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.28 | 1.45 | 1.50 |
| Joshua L. ColburnFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| JAMES A. STRAINSommer & Barnard PC | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 8 | 2.51 | 0.00 | 0.00 |