electroCore, Inc. ECOR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1560258Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Jun 2018 to Nov 2022
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dentons US LLPFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C.First linked Oct 2025 · Text search only · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jan 2025 · Text search only · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Durham Jones & PinegarFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Jun 2018 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dentons US LLP | Feb 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 102 | 0.91 | 0.40 | 1.48 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C. | Oct 2025 | Text search only | 51 | 1.26 | 0.95 | 1.31 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jan 2025 | Text search only | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Durham Jones & Pinegar | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 47 | 1.70 | 1.06 | 1.40 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Jun 2018 | Text search only | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ira L. KotelDentons US LLPFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- Nathan AjiashviliLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ira L. KotelDentons US LLP | Feb 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.60 |
| Nathan AjiashviliLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.34 |