North Atlantic Drilling Ltd. NADL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1560186Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Watson Farley & WilliamsFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seward & Kissel | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.31 |
| Watson Farley & Williams | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 93 | 0.59 | 0.32 | 1.32 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gary J. WolfeSeward & KisselFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.67×
- Kate BlankenshipSeward & KisselFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Robert E. LustrinSeward & KisselFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 2.91×
- Keith BillottiSeward & KisselFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary J. WolfeSeward & Kissel | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 2.67 |
| Kate BlankenshipSeward & Kissel | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 8 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Robert E. LustrinSeward & Kissel | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 40 | 1.29 | 0.55 | 2.91 |
| Keith BillottiSeward & Kissel | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 30 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 1.19 |