Resource REIT, Inc.
CIK 1559484Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Drinker Biddle & ReathFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 213 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| DLA Piper | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Alston & Bird | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.76 |
| Drinker Biddle & Reath | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 213 | 1.46 | 0.77 | 1.26 |
| Willkie Farr | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian M. StadlerSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2022 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- Matthew B. RogersSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2022 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Andrew M. DavissonDLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Laura K. SirianniDLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert H. BergdoltDLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian M. StadlerSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2022 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| Matthew B. RogersSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2022 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Andrew M. DavissonDLA Piper | Jul 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Laura K. SirianniDLA Piper | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert H. BergdoltDLA Piper | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.94 |