Acelity L.P. Inc.
CIK 1557939Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Carey OlsenFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Alston & Bird | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Carey Olsen | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 94 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael KimKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- David A. CurtissPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael KimKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| David A. CurtissPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 24 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 160 | 1.27 | 0.15 | 0.90 |