Globant S.A. GLOB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1557860Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arendt & MedernachFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Brown RudnickFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Davis & GilbertFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- K&L GatesFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arendt & Medernach | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| DLA Piper | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Brown Rudnick | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 137 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.97 |
| Maples and Calder | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Davis & Gilbert | May 2013 | Text search only | 20 | 1.52 | 0.58 | 1.52 |
| K&L Gates | May 2013 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2013 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen P. AlicantiDLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2025 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Christopher C. PaciDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- David BreachKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen P. AlicantiDLA Piper | Apr 2025 | Named in a filing | 42 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Christopher C. PaciDLA Piper | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| David BreachKirkland & Ellis | May 2013 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |